Christian News Groups

in a tone so cold and flat you’d have thought I’d asked her to consider the merits of intelligent design. I would ask my boyfriend, who is a barista himself, but he killed his credibility last year when he wore a pair of hand-me-downs …

Like the intelligent design crowd, they want to try and turn science on its head and have their faith claims - and that is what they are - taken as fact right out of the gate. And heaven help you if you question their methods or …

Well, even the intelligent design crowd gives the planet a few thousand more than that, and I told her “it’s how many years since Jesus was born.” And now I was in for it. “Who’s Jesus?” she asked. She’d been to Sunday school in San …

It would seem the 45th verse is “intelligent design“: 45 This is the meaning of the vision of the rock cut out of a mountain, but not by human hands—a rock that broke the iron, the bronze, the clay, the silver and the gold to pieces. …

… or any classic monster movies knows that man shuld not mess in the realm of God and if this Big Bang theory is right these scientists will blow us all up. Of course if its not, they’ll have struck a big blow for intelligent design.

He is an intelligent design advocate, and as many among the higher bracket of the IQ distribution know, intelligent design is not a science so much as it is the act of throwing science down the stairs. • “YOU CANNOT PROVE TO ME THAT GOD …

Intelligent design was the first thing that came to mind when I read the dictionary definition, but now that I’ve been reading a bit more, I see it as a more complex issue that needs more thought than I have to give at this time. …

If anybody cares enough to follow the nothing I’ve been writing here, you’ll notice that I’ve been writing nothing here for a number of weeks. Trust me when I say that I have a reason, and it might result in a short column on why I …

“AGU release on intelligent design” Posted by qschiermeier to intelligentdesign on Wed Aug 03 2005

43,000 Scientists: Bush Puts Schoolchildren At Risk: Corante > The Loom >

The philosopher Daniel Dennett is interviewed in Der Spiegel (in English) and talks insightfully about Intelligent Design and Darwin. Really good contextualizing explanation. Then he goes off on religion in a way that I personally find not just tiresome but sloppy. He, like Richard Dawkins, talks about religion in general, as if all religions were the same, as if one critique fits all. Further, he’s such an outsider to religion that he assumes believers are all simpletons. I find that smug, irksome and not very philosophical. [Tags: DanielDennett IntelligentDesign religion philosophy]